If the traditional family is abhorred like it is in the depicted picture, then perhaps modern free market would be considered as a better place for women to grow or thrive ... What needs to be acknowledged that often women in the modern market society also complain about their unequal treatment (not to mention colossal amount of sexual harassment cases [1] which doesn't seems to reduce with more freedom) like why their wages are not as same as men? Its seems this complain never questions the foundation of free market society which legitimize free competition in a social Darwinian context means the FITTEST WILL SURVIVE/THRIVE [2] ... free unregulated competition eventually create conditions for inequality, which hurt both men and women equally.
Showing posts with label Women's Rights. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Women's Rights. Show all posts
Saturday, March 17, 2018
Thursday, December 22, 2016
Pornification of Women's image in Western Culture
Sometimes backed I watched a few TED talks (by Gail Dines, Holly Baxter, Jean Kilbourne, Ran Gavrieli) on the impact of the image of objectified women in an advertisement in the west is impacting the well-being of women ...
All of them argued that the women in the west are literally forced in the name of freedom of expression to act more like a porn star, and teenage boys (discovering and becoming addicted to porn at an age of 10-12) are also growing up learning the same, with a growing tendency to dominate, oppress, exploit, abuse, humiliate women in their lives ...
All of them argued that the women in the west are literally forced in the name of freedom of expression to act more like a porn star, and teenage boys (discovering and becoming addicted to porn at an age of 10-12) are also growing up learning the same, with a growing tendency to dominate, oppress, exploit, abuse, humiliate women in their lives ...
Tuesday, September 24, 2013
Jihad al-Nikah vs Gang-Bang in Porn Industry
There was a news circulating around that many Tunisian girls are traveling to have sex with insurgents in Syria which were raising eye brows for many. If any of such things have happened (lets assume just for the sake of argument as it could be nothing but propaganda to discredit the insurgents in the eyes of public) then justification from an Islamic perspective for this act isn't a point of concern in this article as the concept of temporary marriage does exist which could have been used by insurgents and their temporary wives in Syria.
The intriguing point rather is that the same liberals who were raising their eye brows here, never said any thing about the gang-bag thing which is common practice in porn industry. Can one imagine a women having sex with as much as 919 men in one day to create a world record (Google 'world sex records' to find out)! brothers and sisters this has happened in this world, and another women who had intercourse with 1500 people in two days time... Does the same so called liberals raise their eyebrows when hundreds of thousands of girls have sex with multiple men in porn industry in the name of gang-bag?
This duplicity is a proof that the problem of these so called liberals isn't with a women having sex with multiple men, but the pretext in which it is being justified. When its porn industry then its OK because it's 'freedom of expression', and stakes of millions of dollars (if not billions) are involved, but when a similar thing is done by some insurgents (assuming that they have) fighting in the name of Islam, then boy you would hear lots of liberals saying 'what the f..k is going on'...
Thats just not it, women in the name of self-determination are allowed to bear the burden of raising many children alone out of wedlock, while facing the humiliation of competition in the job market to survive financially; and when their skin is sold and their figures objectified in the advertisement industry, and what not... but all of this is considered OK primarily because its all being done in the name of freedom of expression and right of self-determination, etc.
But so called liberals with their chicken hearts and a hypocritical attire (which they shamefully deny) never gather enough guts to openly denounce religion, rather prefer to attack various seemingly absurd things happening in the name of religion, but when they do so they forget what's really happening in their own backyards.
Those Muslims who take the position of apologists in such propaganda must rather counter this by showing the liberals their own face when they pretend to lecture on morality and values.
The intriguing point rather is that the same liberals who were raising their eye brows here, never said any thing about the gang-bag thing which is common practice in porn industry. Can one imagine a women having sex with as much as 919 men in one day to create a world record (Google 'world sex records' to find out)! brothers and sisters this has happened in this world, and another women who had intercourse with 1500 people in two days time... Does the same so called liberals raise their eyebrows when hundreds of thousands of girls have sex with multiple men in porn industry in the name of gang-bag?
This duplicity is a proof that the problem of these so called liberals isn't with a women having sex with multiple men, but the pretext in which it is being justified. When its porn industry then its OK because it's 'freedom of expression', and stakes of millions of dollars (if not billions) are involved, but when a similar thing is done by some insurgents (assuming that they have) fighting in the name of Islam, then boy you would hear lots of liberals saying 'what the f..k is going on'...
Thats just not it, women in the name of self-determination are allowed to bear the burden of raising many children alone out of wedlock, while facing the humiliation of competition in the job market to survive financially; and when their skin is sold and their figures objectified in the advertisement industry, and what not... but all of this is considered OK primarily because its all being done in the name of freedom of expression and right of self-determination, etc.
But so called liberals with their chicken hearts and a hypocritical attire (which they shamefully deny) never gather enough guts to openly denounce religion, rather prefer to attack various seemingly absurd things happening in the name of religion, but when they do so they forget what's really happening in their own backyards.
Those Muslims who take the position of apologists in such propaganda must rather counter this by showing the liberals their own face when they pretend to lecture on morality and values.
Saturday, April 20, 2013
Mommy, I am Pregnant!
Can you imagine your 14 year old daughter coming and tell
you that I am pregnant with the child of my boyfriend? If this happens, God
forbids, then what would be your response? How would you react to it even when
Pakistani law also doesn't put any sexual restrictions on those who are less than
16 years of age? Do you anticipate such a scenario in near future? If you don't
then you better should in the wake of bombardment of liberal values by Media,
gradual removal of religious content from schools, whilst the feminist
movements gets a free hand by authorities to brainwash women into the oblivion
of freedom, and of course all of this is almost at the verge of being idealized
through a new youth Idol called Malala Yousuf Zai...Saturday, April 13, 2013
Freedom for Women, or Freedom to Approach & Enslave Women?
It is often argued that idle women workforce is a great loss
to the economy, and by making them work the economic growth can be accelerated.
It is also argued that this is the fundamental right of the women to be
economically independent. In defense of this argument various reasons are given
like a financially independent woman is better able to take care of herself and
her children, and that she and her children are healthier, more educated and
have better chance of coming out of poverty.
Monday, February 25, 2013
The Architects of Soicety in Suicidal Mode
Mother, Father and the teacher are the architects of the next generation in a traditional Islamic society, but what happens to their roles after modernization?
Naturally a child when is born is supposed to spend two years particularly in the laps of her mother primarily because nature has put his food in her breasts. When he grows older, this initial bond is supposed to remain strongest with her mother, however his father would become the next source of inspiration and guidance... The family is therefore meant to transfer the morals, values, character, dialects, general knowledge about the surroundings etc... When the child grows older, he is made to interact with a teacher who further instructs about various disciplines.
After growing old with these three individuals, a person is supposed to be strong in character and morals, psychologically & intellectually mature enough to become a constructive and productive citizen of the society as a whole, and to develop the next generation on the same foot prints. This person is also supposed to be honest, having high integrity, opposed to corruption, and courageous enough to raise his voice against corrupt elements in the society.
Thursday, February 14, 2013
Cultural Influence vs. Cultural Imperialism
By Farhan Noor
Need For Reconstruction of Social Order in the Light of Quran
There is justification in growing taunts and ridicule hurled against our identity—or rather at poor imitation of theirs; when cats bark and cows bray, surely, even a modest man cannot restrain himself from a hysterical laugh. Why do we then dress up like clowns and act like pigs? Surely, this nation has more IQ than that of a donkey-cart and more self-respect and dignity than a pea-sized pumpkin—but then why do we behave the way we do: like downright idiots? Why cannot we be just ‘us’? —but then, who are we? I believe this is our national dilemma: identity crisis! It is rightly said: when man does not know his worth—he simply becomes worthless.
Need For Reconstruction of Social Order in the Light of Quran
There is justification in growing taunts and ridicule hurled against our identity—or rather at poor imitation of theirs; when cats bark and cows bray, surely, even a modest man cannot restrain himself from a hysterical laugh. Why do we then dress up like clowns and act like pigs? Surely, this nation has more IQ than that of a donkey-cart and more self-respect and dignity than a pea-sized pumpkin—but then why do we behave the way we do: like downright idiots? Why cannot we be just ‘us’? —but then, who are we? I believe this is our national dilemma: identity crisis! It is rightly said: when man does not know his worth—he simply becomes worthless.
59:19 And be ye not like those who forgot Allah. and He made them forget their own souls! Such are the rebellious transgressors!Sniff. This blatant imitation of the western (pop) and eastern (hindi) socio-cultural lifestyle is a pathetic attempt to become one of ‘them’ as if the civilizations they represent are any models of excellence. It is tempting to unfold my thoughts the way I do…gradually…but I’d rather declare and proclaim at first instant, in single meaning words, lest I am hanged, what this article is not about: contempt for the leper; and what this article is in fact all about: vilification of leprosy. In context—let not the reader doubt my utmost respect for the Americans, the British, and the Indian people. On the contrary, I feel these nations themselves are victims of the socio-cultural system that has left us all farther and farther away from our innate human nature i.e. need for worship of One God. This only makes it more and more relevant to propose an apt alternative against this organization of artificial ethos.
The Industry of Women Rights (Part 1)
By Editor Critic Magazine
Discrimination of and abuse against women comes in all shapes, colors, and sizes. Pakistan has its own market as exemplified in honor-killings, acid-attacks, the usurious dowry system, and the act of disinheritance. Champions of women’s rights do not champion against these particular varieties of dehumanizing acts simply on case of it being dehumanizing per se, but rather, because, honor-killing is hardly a business venture. Understand that we are all products of this capitalist economic system, and mentality, which regards anything and everything marketable as long as it is profitable, including rights, or as in this case: women’s rights. If not, then, according to Noam Chomsky, why is marijuana illegal but tobacco not, when research and evidence over-emphatically proves the latter to be deadlier?
Answer: because marijuana plant can be grown by anyone anywhere even indoors making it a no-business a no-show. Likewise—though hard-to-digest—honor-killings in Pakistan and elsewhere are condemned simply because not that we should as a matter of principle, or maybe it is, but basically because it is hard to make a business out of it. Again, if not, then why this deafening hoo-hah against honor-killings on the one hand and murderous silence on the business of prostitution and depiction of sexually objectified imageries notably those “adult” programs that run on Cable TV and those readily available pirated DVDs at movie outlets, on the other? Why this double-standard? Is it perhaps somehow ok to see a woman pole and lap dance naked for a man and prostitute for a living than to be killed in the name of so-called dignity and honor? No, the reason being that honor-killing is our marijuana and prostitution and pornography, our tobacco!
Discrimination of and abuse against women comes in all shapes, colors, and sizes. Pakistan has its own market as exemplified in honor-killings, acid-attacks, the usurious dowry system, and the act of disinheritance. Champions of women’s rights do not champion against these particular varieties of dehumanizing acts simply on case of it being dehumanizing per se, but rather, because, honor-killing is hardly a business venture. Understand that we are all products of this capitalist economic system, and mentality, which regards anything and everything marketable as long as it is profitable, including rights, or as in this case: women’s rights. If not, then, according to Noam Chomsky, why is marijuana illegal but tobacco not, when research and evidence over-emphatically proves the latter to be deadlier?Answer: because marijuana plant can be grown by anyone anywhere even indoors making it a no-business a no-show. Likewise—though hard-to-digest—honor-killings in Pakistan and elsewhere are condemned simply because not that we should as a matter of principle, or maybe it is, but basically because it is hard to make a business out of it. Again, if not, then why this deafening hoo-hah against honor-killings on the one hand and murderous silence on the business of prostitution and depiction of sexually objectified imageries notably those “adult” programs that run on Cable TV and those readily available pirated DVDs at movie outlets, on the other? Why this double-standard? Is it perhaps somehow ok to see a woman pole and lap dance naked for a man and prostitute for a living than to be killed in the name of so-called dignity and honor? No, the reason being that honor-killing is our marijuana and prostitution and pornography, our tobacco!
Sunday, January 6, 2013
Don't get Married, says Media
Indian movies, TV commercials, TV
dramas (Indian, Pakistani and Turkish) etc. are all giving a very clear message
to young blood of the nation, that if you don't have a girl friend, your
life sucks... it’s interesting to compare the theme of dramas coming on
various TV channels during prime time and the ads which comes in between... the
story in dramas shows horrifying, painful situation, full of miseries post marriage scenario; on the contrary the TV commercials mostly presents a very colorful and
enchanting relationship of a boy & girl who are of course not married... they
play, dance, giggle, and do all kind of fun whereas the characters in dramas
are shown to be in real trouble, crying most of the time with a intensely
depressing background music... the subliminal message received is clear... "Don't get married as life before it is
full of fun, enjoyment and joyful pleasures, not after that"...
Thursday, December 6, 2012
The Murder of Motherhood
Baba meree mama kahan hain? (Dad,
where is my mother)
Beta mam apne kam se gae'n hain
abhi ati hain... (son she is gone for some work, she will be back soon)...
My 3yr old son often asks this
question when her mother, who is a house wife, goes outside for a couple of
hours to attend a language class once in a week. The emotions in the question
are unexplainable. If I put myself into his place, i would ask in such a way
when i would feel that a part of me has gone missing. Parents, specially mothers, make their
children feel complete, particularly when they are young, whereas in their absence
children feel a terrible sense of insecurity and void within and around themselve (see Stephan
R. Covey's 7 Habits of highly effective families and M. Scott Peck's a Road
Less Travelled). This I witnessed as well in a young girl, classmate of my son,
who had begun to behave aggressively to an abnormal level, to express her frustration
which she feel in the absence of her mother, who goes to her job from 9am-5pm,
particularly after the maternity leave which she took due to the birth of her
2nd child. This young girl had developed a violent behavior toward her new born
son as well.
Friday, October 19, 2012
Adultery not a Crime, UN
![]() |
| http://www.thenews.com.pk/Todays-News-1-138344- Adultery-is-not-a-crime-UN |
Wednesday, August 1, 2012
The Women Rights Hoax
By Omar Javaid
Both men and women are living together since the very beginning of history,
they have lived and survived in equal proportions throughout, and
even today their proportions in the world population of around 7 billion is
almost equal[i].
This makes a curious mind eventually asks after looking at the present day
mantras from women empowerment and liberation, that how come womankind has
survived since thousands of years in equal proportions, despite all the
supposed atrocities, oppressions, and wrath of men's domination, if there is
any?
There can be multiple answers to this question:
1) If the hypothesis of men being 'brutally against women's
wellbeing' is correct then definitely we can assume that she has the capacity
to survive those hardships as otherwise her percentage in population must have
been significantly lower than that of men, which eventually would have
increased her importance or value due to scarcity but more men would be left
without partners which would have in turn caused frustration, rage and
subsequent conflicts and disturbance in the society. If the hypothesis of men
being brutal 'in relative terms' is false then we should ask what really the
fuss is all about?
2) If the birth ratios of men would have been less than
women, which is not really the case in reality[ii] then we could have assume that men's brutal
attitude actually serves a noble purpose rather, i.e. to balance out the
proportions among the population of both genders, as otherwise there would have
been more women than men on the planet, their value would also have decreased
due to abundance; and an even larger number of women would have left without
partners (read husbands), 'an even larger' because survivability of male is
lesser then women, to be very precise 1.07 male births are there for each
female birth but while the babies turn into adults, the ratio is reduced to
1.01 males per female[iii].
So what the fuss is really all about, let us then find out ...
Tuesday, July 31, 2012
Aafia Siddiqui, a Threat to a Multi Billion Dollar Industry
Amazed with the ease through which she is blasting away the very foundation of a multi billion dollar industry of fashion and other segments which objectifies women as to sell its products. What a threat she would have been to capitalism if she would have been roaming freely in western world, they saw it coming didn't they ...
Wednesday, October 5, 2011
India: Girls asked to Wear Modest Cloths
"Women in India are now told not venture out late at night, not to travel alone, not to wear certain type of clothes. This is what precisely Islam teaches. In maharashtra Shiv Sainiks are acting as moral police stopping valentine celebrations by force, vandalising shops that sell chocolates, Card and flowers for Valentine's day. Girls were stopped from dancing in the Bars and Anna Hazare activists in his model village stopped all liqicuor trade and Liquor shops.
Friday, July 8, 2011
A Wave of Sexual Terrorism in Iraq
Behind the rape and murder of an Iraqi girl and her family lies a far larger story of what's happened to women in Iraq since they were 'liberated' by the Bush administration. - It is crazy that these women are sitting there on the floor of a prison cell with a goddamn man and gun standing over them. At the very maximum, these women may have somehow assisted their men to get these brutal soldiers, these beasts in human form, these rapists and sodomists, out of their blessed country. Is that a crime?? It is much more likely that these women on the floor have done nothing at all. They were picked up to be used by animals. - WPA
Wednesday, June 8, 2011
Going Rogue: NATO War Crimes in Libya
This summary is not available. Please
click here to view the post.
Is Media Deliberately Defaming Islam
Be wary of the headlines! By Aisha Aijaz
“Muslim beauty stoned to death’’ was a headline on a news website. (7th of June 2011)
The screaming headline is a perfect example of yellow journalism gone wild. Unfortunately these dirty tactics of marketing news have become a norm. The news was picked up from British and Ukrainian newspapers which in summary said,
“Aspiring Miss Ukraine stoned to death under Shariah Law by Crimean Radical Islamist. The man was told to be a radicalised Wahabi extremist and the lady was reportedly a Muslim who was given this punishment by him as it is not allowed for women to take part in a beauty contest in Islam”
Sensational and ‘Masalay-dar’ as it sounds, our heavily funded Pakistani media didn’t bother to carry out any further research before propagating this piece, as it perfectly fulfils the purpose and agenda they are working on.
Sensational and ‘Masalay-dar’ as it sounds, our heavily funded Pakistani media didn’t bother to carry out any further research before propagating this piece, as it perfectly fulfils the purpose and agenda they are working on.
Monday, May 23, 2011
Porn in USA
By Yvonne Ridley
I wonder what the US Administration makes of the idiom that includes the words pot, kettle and black.
The reason for this recent musing comes from revelations that a stash of pornography was found during the infamous Abbottabad raid in Pakistan by US Navy seals.
Not only did the Obama gang boast that they’d finally got the world’s most wanted man but they gleefully revealed a few days later that among the “millions” of intelligence documents was a pile of porn.
Of course we’ve not seen an ounce of evidence to support either of these claims, so not surprisingly there are those demanding that the Americans either ‘put up or shut up’.
Obama argues he will not release pictures depicting the al-Qaida leader’s death because they are too graphic and could offend and inflame Muslims across the world.
It’s an odd argument since he then sees no problem in allowing people to think the al Qaida leader wiled away his days with his head buried in dirty magazines.
But quite frankly, ever since the WMD lies peddled by the US Government to justify the invasion and war in Iraq were exposed most people hold a healthy scepticism towards any official statements coming out of Capitol Hill.
The gullible truly want to believe their government and so they do, but cynics – and they are growing in number even in America these days - recognise weak, transparent propaganda when they see it.
And the OBL porn revelations were indeed weak, highly predictable but also hypocritical. I say this because if you chip beneath the thin veneer of US respectability and family values the country is awash with X-rated smut.
Had Osama bin Ladin checked in to the Marriott, Westin or Hilton hotel chains in America he could have had his pick of X-rated in-room, movies.
I’m told that demand is so high that the blue movie business generates more money than hotel mini-bars.
In Obama’s Apple Pie America, cable and satellite companies pump pornography into millions of homes where the American Dream has, for some, become X-rated.
And the Americans are keen to share – I remember one of the first things that followed the arrival of US forces in Afghanistan was the sex industry.
Scores of channels promoting straight and gay porn suddenly became readily available on television sets without even the need to subscribe.
Yes, I bet that really helped Tony Blair and George W Bush’s crusade to liberate Afghan women.
The internet is also awash with obscene material which exploits women, and it is downloaded daily from US military bases across the world – some sites are so patriotic they even offer their services free of charge to those serving Uncle Sam.
The scale of the problem is so vast that 12 years ago Congress banned sales of sexually explicit material on military bases to keep the Christian right happy but it was never rigorously enforced.
I can reveal that certainly in Guantanamo the porn industry was very much in evidence when I visited with a documentary crew. You’ll have to take my word for it because the Gitmo PR team that escorted me around the base in May 2008 stopped me from filming the shelf racks at the local shop which was awash with dodgy magazines and videos. I still remember one lurid title “Debbie Does Dallas” sitting next to Penthouse.
I thought it would make a sharp contrast to the filming we’d just done in the library used by the Guantanamo detainees where shelves were filled with English classics, Islamic works and copies of the National Geographic.
Of course the reading material accessed by the detainees was specially selected by the authorities but perhaps the Pentagon should be equally selective over the material its soldiers access because there is a link between sexual predators and their reading and viewing material.
Just a few weeks ago 17 veteran and active-duty soldiers filed a lawsuit against the Pentagon. They accuse the U.S. military of permitting a culture that tolerates rape and sexual assault.
Reports show that as many as 3,250 reported rapes or other sexual assaults took place in the U.S. military, in 2009 alone. Military sources admit the unreported incidents could be as high as 16,000 because 80 percent of the victims may not have reported the incidents for fear of reprisal.
Instead of peddling silly propaganda about the stash of porn found in Abbottabad, I suggest American authorities look closer to home.
Interesting that those briefing the media about OBL’s alleged porn stash did so on condition of anonymity … well I wonder what they have to hide?
Could it be a case of porn, kettle and black?
* British journalist Yvonne Ridley is patron of the London-based human rights organization Cageprisoners and European President of the International Muslim Women’s Union.
I wonder what the US Administration makes of the idiom that includes the words pot, kettle and black.
The reason for this recent musing comes from revelations that a stash of pornography was found during the infamous Abbottabad raid in Pakistan by US Navy seals.
Not only did the Obama gang boast that they’d finally got the world’s most wanted man but they gleefully revealed a few days later that among the “millions” of intelligence documents was a pile of porn.
Of course we’ve not seen an ounce of evidence to support either of these claims, so not surprisingly there are those demanding that the Americans either ‘put up or shut up’.
Obama argues he will not release pictures depicting the al-Qaida leader’s death because they are too graphic and could offend and inflame Muslims across the world.
It’s an odd argument since he then sees no problem in allowing people to think the al Qaida leader wiled away his days with his head buried in dirty magazines.
But quite frankly, ever since the WMD lies peddled by the US Government to justify the invasion and war in Iraq were exposed most people hold a healthy scepticism towards any official statements coming out of Capitol Hill.
The gullible truly want to believe their government and so they do, but cynics – and they are growing in number even in America these days - recognise weak, transparent propaganda when they see it.
And the OBL porn revelations were indeed weak, highly predictable but also hypocritical. I say this because if you chip beneath the thin veneer of US respectability and family values the country is awash with X-rated smut.
Had Osama bin Ladin checked in to the Marriott, Westin or Hilton hotel chains in America he could have had his pick of X-rated in-room, movies.
I’m told that demand is so high that the blue movie business generates more money than hotel mini-bars.
In Obama’s Apple Pie America, cable and satellite companies pump pornography into millions of homes where the American Dream has, for some, become X-rated.
And the Americans are keen to share – I remember one of the first things that followed the arrival of US forces in Afghanistan was the sex industry.
Scores of channels promoting straight and gay porn suddenly became readily available on television sets without even the need to subscribe.
Yes, I bet that really helped Tony Blair and George W Bush’s crusade to liberate Afghan women.
The internet is also awash with obscene material which exploits women, and it is downloaded daily from US military bases across the world – some sites are so patriotic they even offer their services free of charge to those serving Uncle Sam.
The scale of the problem is so vast that 12 years ago Congress banned sales of sexually explicit material on military bases to keep the Christian right happy but it was never rigorously enforced.
I can reveal that certainly in Guantanamo the porn industry was very much in evidence when I visited with a documentary crew. You’ll have to take my word for it because the Gitmo PR team that escorted me around the base in May 2008 stopped me from filming the shelf racks at the local shop which was awash with dodgy magazines and videos. I still remember one lurid title “Debbie Does Dallas” sitting next to Penthouse.
I thought it would make a sharp contrast to the filming we’d just done in the library used by the Guantanamo detainees where shelves were filled with English classics, Islamic works and copies of the National Geographic.
Of course the reading material accessed by the detainees was specially selected by the authorities but perhaps the Pentagon should be equally selective over the material its soldiers access because there is a link between sexual predators and their reading and viewing material.
Just a few weeks ago 17 veteran and active-duty soldiers filed a lawsuit against the Pentagon. They accuse the U.S. military of permitting a culture that tolerates rape and sexual assault.
Reports show that as many as 3,250 reported rapes or other sexual assaults took place in the U.S. military, in 2009 alone. Military sources admit the unreported incidents could be as high as 16,000 because 80 percent of the victims may not have reported the incidents for fear of reprisal.
Instead of peddling silly propaganda about the stash of porn found in Abbottabad, I suggest American authorities look closer to home.
Interesting that those briefing the media about OBL’s alleged porn stash did so on condition of anonymity … well I wonder what they have to hide?
Could it be a case of porn, kettle and black?
* British journalist Yvonne Ridley is patron of the London-based human rights organization Cageprisoners and European President of the International Muslim Women’s Union.
Wednesday, September 15, 2010
"Dr. Aafia Siddiqui, a victim of lies", says Yvonne Ridley
By M. Khalid Rehman, Karachi
During Musharraf's rule, the Afghan ambassador to Pakistan Mulla Abdus Salaam Zaeef was caught by Pakistani authorities and handed over to the Americans. He was sent to the Guantanamo camp but was freed in 2005. The United Nations removed his name from its list of terrorists in July 2010.
Dr Aafia Siddiqui, a Pakistani neuroscientist, was also kidnapped by Pakistani authorities and sold to the US. She has been convicted in a US federal court of assault with intent to murder her US interrogators. She is incarcerated in New York and is awaiting a likely sentence of life in prison, which will be announced on September 23. Her entire case was built on lies, says Yvonne Ridley, a British journalist and war correspondent to Afghanistan told a group of Pakistani journalists at the residence of Dr Aafia's sister in Karachi on September 14.
Talking to journalists in Karachi, Yvonne Ridely said, "Some lies started wars--like President Bush's war on Iraq; and some lies destroy lives of individuals--like the statement that a frail woman imprisoned in a cell snatched the gun of an American soldier and tried to attack him."
Yvonne Ridley expressed surprise that the American trial judge in Aafia's case was not interested in the Aafia's past record, and had insisted only on knowing what had happened during those few minutes in the cell where Aafia was held in Afghanistan. The entire case is a big farce as it was never proved that Aafia fired any shots or even picked the gun. The British journalist said, "Lying comes easy to Americans."
Ridley interviewed Afghan police chief and other officials. She found that the translation of their statements in the court were distorted. "It was a mis-trial. Aafia is the most wronged woman on the planet in history, She was separated from her children, and so brutally abused that she has lost her mind. How can you try in a court of law a woman who is not in her right mind because of the tortures she was submitted to in military custody and from whom her children had been snatched?. Is this American definition of the rule of law?" Ridley remarked.
This makes one think why can the United States release a Taliban government functionary but afraid of releasing a mother of three little children?
During Musharraf's rule, the Afghan ambassador to Pakistan Mulla Abdus Salaam Zaeef was caught by Pakistani authorities and handed over to the Americans. He was sent to the Guantanamo camp but was freed in 2005. The United Nations removed his name from its list of terrorists in July 2010.
Dr Aafia Siddiqui, a Pakistani neuroscientist, was also kidnapped by Pakistani authorities and sold to the US. She has been convicted in a US federal court of assault with intent to murder her US interrogators. She is incarcerated in New York and is awaiting a likely sentence of life in prison, which will be announced on September 23. Her entire case was built on lies, says Yvonne Ridley, a British journalist and war correspondent to Afghanistan told a group of Pakistani journalists at the residence of Dr Aafia's sister in Karachi on September 14.
Talking to journalists in Karachi, Yvonne Ridely said, "Some lies started wars--like President Bush's war on Iraq; and some lies destroy lives of individuals--like the statement that a frail woman imprisoned in a cell snatched the gun of an American soldier and tried to attack him."
Yvonne Ridley expressed surprise that the American trial judge in Aafia's case was not interested in the Aafia's past record, and had insisted only on knowing what had happened during those few minutes in the cell where Aafia was held in Afghanistan. The entire case is a big farce as it was never proved that Aafia fired any shots or even picked the gun. The British journalist said, "Lying comes easy to Americans."
Ridley interviewed Afghan police chief and other officials. She found that the translation of their statements in the court were distorted. "It was a mis-trial. Aafia is the most wronged woman on the planet in history, She was separated from her children, and so brutally abused that she has lost her mind. How can you try in a court of law a woman who is not in her right mind because of the tortures she was submitted to in military custody and from whom her children had been snatched?. Is this American definition of the rule of law?" Ridley remarked.
This makes one think why can the United States release a Taliban government functionary but afraid of releasing a mother of three little children?
Saturday, July 24, 2010
Bikini or headscarf -- which offers more freedom?
Krista Bremer holds her daughter Aliya in the scarf the child decided she wanted to wear.
Nine years ago, I danced my newborn daughter around my North Carolina living room to the music of "Free to Be...You and Me", the '70s children's classic whose every lyric about tolerance and gender equality I had memorized as a girl growing up in California.
My Libyan-born husband, Ismail, sat with her for hours on our screened porch, swaying back and forth on a creaky metal rocker and singing old Arabic folk songs, and took her to a Muslim sheikh who chanted a prayer for long life into her tiny, velvety ear.
She had espresso eyes and lush black lashes like her father's, and her milky-brown skin darkened quickly in the summer sun. We named her Aliya, which means "exalted" in Arabic, and agreed we would raise her to choose what she identified with most from our dramatically different backgrounds.
I secretly felt smug about this agreement -- confident that she would favor my comfortable American lifestyle over his modest Muslim upbringing. Ismail's parents live in a squat stone house down a winding dirt alley outside Tripoli. Its walls are bare except for passages from the Quran engraved onto wood, its floors empty but for thin cushions that double as bedding at night.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)




