OPEN Floor
by Farhan Noor, Editor Critic Magazine
See Table A: Identifying the Extremists Within
| Muslim Extremists/Terrorists | Muslim Moderates (Silent Majority) | Constitution of Pakistan 1973 | Muslim Secularists/Liberalists |
Politics | Doesn’t care whether it’s a democratic or autocratic setup, as long as Shariah is established | Shariah-compliant Democracy | Shariah-compliant Democracy. “No Law shall be enacted repugnant of Quran & Sunnah” | Neo-liberalistic Democracy Shariah has no place in the political setup of the country. Enforcement of European or American secular socio-economic and political order instead |
Economics | Elimination of Riba, poverty, gambling, cultivation of drugs, equitable distribution of wealth | Elimination of Riba, poverty, gambling, cultivation of drugs, equitable distribution of wealth | Supreme Court’s decision against Riba | Naked capitalism: Riba its hallmark Survival of the fittest mentality, therefore no real steps or intentions to eliminate poverty or equitably distribute wealth in the country |
Society & Culture | Ban on the sale of Alcohol, on music, lavish lifestyle, singing, dancing, modeling, Basant destruction of all pornographic material Interference in personal lives of the people to force them keep beard No pursuit of scientific education | Sale of Alcohol should be limited to licensed outlets for non-Muslims only Enforcement of strict censorship on vulgar, obscene, and non-family media programs Believes there is room for music, singing, and dancing in Islam but not modeling and beauty pageantries Believes nobody has the right to interfere in private matters Pursues scientific education | Ban on the sale of Alcohol Ban on Basant Ban on food at weddings (wanton display of wealth) Music, singing, dancing should not be vulgar or obscene Nobody has the right to interfere in personal matters of the citizens | Sale of Alcohol should be allowed Music, singing, dancing, modeling and beauty pageantries considered morally acceptable forms of entertainment Pursues and promote scientific education |
Legal Matters | Death Penalty to Adulterer, Rapist, Apostasy, for Blasphemy, Lashes to fornicator, Drunkards, lying witnesses Chopping of thief’s hands | Whatever-Shariah-Says mentality while grossly ignorant of what Shariah wants; susceptible to manipulation and exploitation of their ignorance by both religious and secular extremists | Death Penalty to Adulterer, Rapist, Apostasy, for Blasphemy Lashes to fornicator, Drunkards, lying witnesses Chopping of thief’s hands | Strict adherents to U.N. charter of human rights and women’s rights (CEDAW) Consider death penalty, lashing, and chopping of hands as “barbaric” and “prehistoric” laws |
Women’s Rights | Burqah (complete veil), Purda (complete segregation), and char-dewari Ban on coeducation Roles: as wife and/or mother only Consider polygamy legal Distribution of inheritance on Quranic laws: women usually get half | Believes a woman should be modestly dressed. Hair and arms should be covered Rejects char-dewari: women have right to work if they want Divided on co-education Polygamy and Inheritance Laws as per what Shariah says | Women should be modest in clothing (Media Laws) Rejects char-dewari Polygamy and Inheritance Laws as sanctioned by Shariah | Considers Hijab (modest clothing), Polygamy, Quranic Inheritance Law as discriminatory of womenfolk Women must work. Family and children can take care for themselves |
Focus of Life | Only on hereafter | Both on earthly life and hereafter | Both on earthly life and hereafter | Greatly on earthly life |
Agenda | “Enforcement” of Shariah in Pakistan No personal interests involved | “Establishment” of Shariah in Pakistan | “Establishment” of Shariah in Pakistan | Sheer personal interests Blatant pursuit of power and wealth |
Modus Operandi | Through force (hard revolution) Terrorizing people into submission to Islam through suicide bombings Concept of Jihad believed as waging a war against whoever rejects Shariah Create State within State and taking the Law into their own hands | Through preaching (soft revolution) Believes in participatory citizenship; that change can brought through competing in elections etc | Strict enforcement and adherence of the Constitution in toto | Through force (direct confrontation) Clashes with extremists in order to “root out” extremism Through manipulation and exploitation of moderates ignorance of Shariah |
Professional Life | Suicide Bombers Militants | Family & Career | | Politicians, NGO’s and women activists—by and large, but not all |
Strength | 2-4% | 92% | | 2-4% |
Fast Food For Thoughts:
1. The demands of religious extremists are not only religiously correct but also constitutionally legal! What makes it even more interesting is the fact that these people are not after power or for money but are instead only fighting for the establishment of Shariah in Pakistan, something which is hardly objectionable. Their demands for elimination of Riba, Gambling, Drugs, shutting down of Brothels and end to Prostitution, ban on sale of Alcohol, and destruction of all Pornographic Material is again NOT ONLY religiously correct, constitutionally legal, but also socio-economically beneficial. However, their actions—of militancy and suicide bombing—are greatly condemnable and outright abhorrent which cannot be justified under any pretext or pretension. Little is wonder why they find no public support even though their demands are valid.
2. On the other hand, the secular extremists feel that the European and American secular laws must replace the now “outdated” Shariah. For them, Islam is just not good enough. Therefore, even though these people claim to be moderates and loyal to Islam, they have no intentions on eliminating Riba, Gambling, Drugs, to shut down Brothels and end Prostitution, ban sale of Alcohol, and censor the prevailing Vulgarity and Obscenity in electronic media today let alone porn! Little is wonder why the Hudood Ordinance was abolished but the Heera Mandi continues to thrive on. Both their demands (secularization of Pakistan) and their actions (see Table A) are clearly unconstitutional and illegal. They are bent on changing the ideology of Pakistan and on adulterating the essence of Islam in the name of “modernization” while in blatant pursuit of power and wealth—and this to me is really the greatest and the worst form of extremism.
3. Clearly—both extremist factions (religious and secular)—are detrimental to the health of our country. One (religious extremists) are terrorizing innocent people and disturbing the peace of the society while the other (secular extremists) are systematically and categorically secularizing Pakistan from the top to the bottom through the tools of Education and Media. Both must be condemned and rejected. This leaves us—the silent majority—to do something now for the country to save it from spiraling down into a civil war or becoming another victim of war of terrorism by the U.S. But first we must clearly understand how the International Media have grouped the extremists and the moderates into one category and declared the secularists as the moderates. This can easily be done if we only differentiate between people based on what they believe in and not with what label or construct (Talibanization, Mullahism, etc) they have been stereotyped with. For e.g.: what we see secularism as something ‘modern’ and ‘enlightened’ and ‘progressive’ is but another form of extremism and nothing else, and this what we must see through now.
4. The most important thing that we—the Silent Majority—should do is to take a stance and stop being hypocritically neutral. This continuing silence and passivity and more annoyingly, this gross ignorance of current affairs, and lack of passion and interest in the desire for change is harmful not only to ourselves but also for the country. Unless we citizens participate or at least seek to participate in decision-making activities of the socio-economic and political policies of the country, the country will forever remain weak and unstable and a soft target for our enemies both from within and from the without.
OPEN Minds: Send in your less-than-500-words opinions at omar.javaid@criticmagazine.pk or editor@criticmagazine.pk Include your name, your address, your profession, and also a justification for your answer. |
Very well written Farhan. But the silent majority chooses their own fate by remaining silent. They are silent consentors to the status quo. Perhaps they don't want Riba ideologically but use it in their business. So they think it's wrong but they don't want it to stop. Their interests are served when the two parties fight and no one wins; in short they have the best of both worlds and their children don't have to die: other people do.
ReplyDeleteThe reason I bring this extreme case in front of you is because I want you to ask yourself: Why is the majority silent? First answer this question and then u can recommend how to solve this issue; you've put the cart before the horse.
BL
Great post!! We, the silent majority, agree. However, the extremists are highly motivated to introduce their version of Sharia and are willing to kill and die for it.
ReplyDeleteTime for a sensible response that is based on wisdom.
You are on the right track. For the silent majority to assert itself, start opposing the enforcement of tribal law under the banner of shriah. And we must constantly raise our voice against the liberal extremists. Write and speak as much as you can, make orseves heard.
ReplyDeleteVery well said. Silent majority is just enjoying the peace until its shaken. we are reaping the benefit of international finance/trade and keeping silent on the pit-falls of imperialism. It is very clear on given table that if we ask any policeman (enforcer of Constitution) the same quests we propose for taliban? What outdated laws they bring in for us? What barbaric treatment in constitution they force?
ReplyDeleteAll of our society is in trap of self serving material power collection and still wants to be qualified as MOMINs? This duality is the main culprit.
ziawan